Croatia’s construction sector: a potential casualty of war

Written by Michael Glazer (SEE Regional Advisors) and Tatjana Halapija (Nada Projekt), EECFA’s Croatian members

The Croatian economy, including its construction sector, is threatened with serious damage this summer. For now, the pain has not been intense and the danger perceived only vaguely. This could change massively for the worse, though, both as to the actual injury and the perception of danger, by the middle of June and even as early as the end of May. Many factors are at work, but there is only one cause: the US-Israeli-Iran war.

Croatian tourism Summer 2026? – Split, Croatia. Photo by Tatjana Halapija

The cause

Ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, which links the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea and so with the rest of the world, has fallen 97%. This is twice as much as in any other oil crisis. This means that crude oil and liquified natural gas (LNG) are no longer being transported in anything resembling normal quantities. Nor are sulfur (an important chemical industry feedstock) or helium (used mostly in cooling, e.g., of MRI scanners), which are produced primarily as byproducts of oil and gas extraction and of which Gulf countries are major suppliers. The same holds true for fertilizer, ethanol, graphite, aluminum, iron and steel pellets and glycol, of which, again, Gulf countries manufacture a large portion of global production. (Pistachio nuts, too, but the effect on the world economy is likely to be less pronounced.) Worse, a significant amount of Gulf petroleum, gas and chemical production capacity has been destroyed or damaged (e.g., up to 17% of Qatar’s LNG production capacity) or will be if the war continues (shut downs often damage oil and gas wells and pipelines).

Although Asia is already suffering severely, with some countries mandating four-day work weeks to save energy, Europe and the United States have been spared the worst effects of these developments so far. That is about to change as supplies of oil, LNG and, even more important in the immediate and short terms, their refined products such as jet fuel and diesel become tight after ships in transit unload and private and national reserves are depleted.

Effects on Croatia: tourism, economy and construction

For Croatia, this will likely alter the sources, type, number and ability to spend of the tourists on which the country’s economy in large part depends .Tourists from distant countries will be deterred from flying to Croatia as the price of tickets and the number of canceled flights, already in the tens of thousands, rapidly rise because of enormous increases in jet fuel prices (doubling in Europe since February 28, 2026). Some in Europe may decide to drive instead, but they and tourists that normally drive to Croatia will find that fuel is expensive. Croatia’s languid approach to upgrading and extending its railways means that rail will for the most part not be a realistic alternative, and anyway rail ticket prices will rise, too, because of higher electricity and diesel prices. The upshot for Croatia is that many tourists may decide to completely alter their holiday plans and vacation nearer to home than Croatia, while those that do come will probably not stay as long and have less money to spend than in the past. This would significantly reduce the income Croatia derives from tourism. Croatia’s reputation for high costs, which higher agricultural product prices due to fertilizer shortages will worsen, will likely exacerbate the problem.

The implications for the Croatian construction industry are that hospitality-facility construction will likely fall in the near term, as owners, operators and investors wait to see just how bad and how long the economic effects of the war will be. The wait could be a long one, given that analysts forecast that these effects will last for at least eighteen months and perhaps considerably longer, particularly if the industrial and storage facilities of belligerents and their allies are targeted in a new outbreak of hostilities.

Damage to Croatia’s tourism sector will of course flow through to the country’s other economic sectors, given how important tourism is to Croatia’s economy. But these sectors will likely be hit directly as well. Further stagnation in countries to which Croatia exports non-tourism goods and services is to be expected because of the rise in the costs of energy and raw and intermediate materials, especially but not only plastics and others made from petroleum. This will put further strain on the Croatian economy.

Aggravating this will be a likely rise in the prices of at least some construction materials. Three examples among many are rebar and cement, both of which are energy intensive to produce, and concrete, which uses petrochemical-based additives. And of course transportation costs will rise. One, rather dim, bright spot is that weak economies in countries to which Croatian construction workers have emigrated could encourage them to return home, helping to keep construction costs down. But taken all in all, the growth rate in output of Croatia’s non-hospitality construction sectors is likely to decline and in some cases to go negative. Even government construction projects may be at risk, because payment of energy, agricultural and other subsidies will deplete the government’s cash reserves and reduced economic activity will diminish its tax take.

The future

The question now is not whether the US-Israeli-Iran war will have significant negative effects on construction in Croatia but rather just how bad those effects will be. In the unlikely event that shipments through the Strait of Hormuz resume before the end of May, the effects would be minimized, although to be clear that does not mean that they would be minimal. If the Strait remains blocked beyond the end of June, consequences for Croatia could be quite substantial, since, analysts believe, European reserves of oil, gas and other important products would by then be exhausted. This would cause prices to jump sharply and continually until recession or other events reduced demand to a level that accorded with supply. If hostilities cause additional significant degradation in Gulf region infrastructure, the situation for the construction sector of Croatia, and that of many other countries, could become quite severe.

Croatian construction market forecast is available in the EECFA Forecast Report Croatia. For sample report or orders, contact us.

Q1 2026 Permit-Completion in EECFA area

The viz was updated on 5 May 2026.
Bulgaria has reached new highs, recovery in Hungary and Romania is ongoing, Russia has been down. 4 more countries will soon publish their Q1 data. The text below will be updated once the round is full.

When it comes to permits, Croatia and Serbia are still very stable. Both countries experienced massive expansion between 2014 and 2022 and they have remained close to their peak every since. Croatia has had more than 4 million, while Serbia has had above 7 million permitted m2 for three years. Last year in Slovenia was not soo good, so it remained below the peak reached in 2022. Bulgaria is also below its latest peak, but permit data of the latest 4 quarters depict a growing optimism, particularly in residential. The mild recovery in Romania, led by the residential submarket, stopped at the end of the year. Hungary turned upward mostly because of the residential permits. The non-residential submarket looks weak, but it has stopped falling further lately, at least.

You may use the dropdown in the viz for selecting either the residential or the non-residential submarket, or both.

See the full viz: EECFA Permit-Completion Quarterly – 5 May 2026

In the full visualization, not only permit but completion data can be followed (where available). Just click on the Country-by-country sheet.

Led by the residential submarket, Türkiye bounced back and up. And due to changing accounting method, all permit time series from 2010 have been revised. From Q2 2025 on, permits issued by authorities other than the municipalities are also published by TUIK. So the scope is bigger, the results show the full picture. Click through the below viz for understanding the size and the impact of this revision. Modest optimism prevails in Ukraine, the permitted floor area keeps expanding. Since the beginning of this year the residential submarket drives this growth. Russia is stable when it comes to completion of buildings. The year-end was strong on both the residential and non-residential submarket.


This visual about the significance of the permit revision in Türkiye was compiled back in September 2025.

The next big thing for Serbia: the Belgrade Metro

Written by Dejan Krajinović, Beobuild Core d.o.o., EECFA Serbia

The construction of the Belgrade Metro stands as the largest single civil engineering project on the horizon and is one of the primary drivers of future economic growth in the coming years in Serbia. For decades, public transport in Belgrade relied solely on buses, trams, and the city railway (BG Voz). Consequently, the development of a comprehensive underground system is expected to have a transformative effect on commuting patterns and travel times. It is worth noting that Belgrade remains the largest city in Europe without a functional underground metro. While the project faced delays for many years, its commencement is now certain, with preparatory works already well underway.

Two massive Belgrade metro Tunnel Boring Machines ready to be shipped from China. Photo by Beogradski metro i voz

Strategic infrastructure: impact of the Belgrade metro project

The project represents a large-scale international collaboration between China and France. The Chinese construction giant PowerChina is tasked with tunnel boring, while the renowned French company Alstom will provide the rolling stock and system management. Recent reports from China confirm that massive, custom-made Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) for the Belgrade Metro are ready, having undergone factory testing, and are set to be shipped to Serbia this June. Two TBMs have been constructed for the first phase of the project, specifically for Line 1. These machines will start boring from opposite ends of the line to meet halfway – a strategy that will make the construction process highly efficient and significantly faster, though it demands exceptional coordination and project management.

Line 1 of the Belgrade Metro is divided into two phases: Phase 1 spans 15km and includes 15 stations, while Phase 2 is a planned extension of an additional 6km and 5 stations. The majority of Phase 1 will be underground, with 11km consisting of deep tunnels and 2km constructed using the cut-and-cover method; only 2.1km of the line will be above ground. The city’s topography presents a significant challenge as some stations will be remarkably deep and complex, reaching up to 40m below ground level. The system will utilize driverless, autonomous vehicles and digital signaling, ensuring maximum efficiency, safety, and frequency.

The original plan envisioned the construction of Line 2 (21km with 23 stations) beginning two years after Line 1, allowing the two projects to partially overlap. However, at this stage, it is uncertain whether parallel realization will proceed as planned. The pace of other phases will depend on the progress of Phase 1 of Line 1, but financial considerations will remain the major factor affecting the speed of future development.

Nevertheless, with the start of Line 1, Belgrade has embarked on a long and ambitious journey that will define the city’s construction landscape for years to come. Estimates suggest that Line 1 could cost between EUR 3.5 and EUR 3.8 billion,meaning the project’s scale will have a tremendous impact on civil engineering output from 2027 onwards. This is a key infrastructure development aimed at boosting growth against recessionary trends in the EU and an unstable global economic environment. On the other hand, the looming dangers of energy shocks, high inflation, and global financial instability remain significant risks—not only for this project but for Serbia’s entire construction industry and the economy as a whole.

EBI Romania – started construction works – 18 April 2026

There was no construction start indicator in Romania, so we have created an estimation for it.

This poster is a summary of our monthly findings. It shows how the total value of started construction works have changed over the same period last year. Besides, it presents which segments have the biggest start value in the current year. We call this indicator Activity-Start. And they are computed every month for 18 construction segments by aggregating data of construction projects. The projects are from the iBuild database and ELTINGA and Buildecon found the way of creating indicators out of them.

If you need short-term foresight, you will like it.

Brief comment from Janos Gaspar, head of Buildecon:

Building construction Activity-Start is still weak. And office construction remained the only bright spot due to the commencement of the Queens District, a large mixed used project in Bucharest. Most other segments, including the multi-unit residential, are looking bad at this phase of data collection. Despite the drop, civil engineering has a strong Q1 mostly because works started on the A8 highway.

Every month this poster will be available here on our blog. If your interest is deeper, we have the EBI data visualization (with indicators for all the 18 segments of the construction market), updated monthly and we have the EBI Construction Activity Report Romania (with data and explanations), published quarterly in English and in Romanian. All these are packed into a yearly subscription. For the specifics, please contact us.

Top trends to track in 2026 in Romanian residential market

Written by Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug – Ebuild srl, EECFA Romania

Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug, EECFA’s Romanian analyst has looked at the trends that are worth monitoring in the residential market in Romania this year. Among them are the construction costs boomerang, the drop in wages and consumption, considerable interest in multi-family buildings, smaller homes and a greater dependence on mortgage loans.

What we saw in 2025

The construction market faced many challenges in the previous year, alongside the entire national economy. While there was a focus on civil engineering, especially when it comes to EU co-funded projects, the rest of the segments lagged behind.

In early 2025, the removal of fiscal facilities for construction employees led to the decline of their net incomes, and an increase in wage-related expenses for companies. Overall, the effect of this measure was an increase in construction costs.

Then came the multiple shocks of the liberalization of energy markets in July, and a VAT increase in August, which pushed inflation upwards significantly, with the CPI reaching 9.88% in September. In a snowball effect, this led to lower real wages and disposable income, which translated into a reduction in private consumption, and, ultimately, means lower demand for residential construction on the short and medium terms.  

The optimism shown in the increased number of permits, and the useful building area in them, compared to 2024, is countered by the decline in the number of completed homes. Thus, while developers might be looking to the future, their actions in the present are lacking, also evidenced by a significant (-21%) annual decline in the value of started construction works in 2025 (source: EBI Construction Activity Report).

What to watch in 2026

Construction costs boomerang. While previously the expectation was that construction costs would gradually decline in 2026, they proved quite resilient to changes in wages, and fuel and construction materials prices remained relatively stable in the past year.  Thus, late 2025 forecasts placed construction costs on a small, descending trend.

The conflict in Iran and its repercussions on oil and gas prices might throw astray these predictions. As of March 2026, oil prices were approaching 2022 levels, and, if they are not reversed rapidly, might have a similar impact on world-wide inflation, energy prices and, eventually, construction costs. A reversal, however, seems rather unlikely at the moment as the damage to energy infrastructure could take years to undo.

To make matters worse, in the past few years home prices grew slower than construction costs, reducing potential profit margins for developers. Added to the decline in real wages, it remains quite unlikely that there will be room for prices to increase alongside construction costs, again similar to 2022, further eating into builders’ financial return potential.

Decline in wages and consumption. Wage growth for 2026 was already forecasted to remain low, underperforming inflation (source NFC – National Forecasting Commission Autumn 2025 Report). Add to that the further shocks now expected from increased energy costs (due to oil and gas prices rising considering the conflict in Iran) and food costs further rising due to increased fertilizer prices, the downwards pressure on real wages is likely to be worse than forecasted, with a slower recovery.

Real wage decline will make it harder to purchase and build new homes, with a negative impact on demand for residential construction. But it could provide a boost to renovation activity, especially when it comes to energy efficiency, as switching homes becomes harder.

High interest in multi-unit residential buildings. Looking at building permits trends for the past decade, single-home buildings have remained relatively stable, while the majority of growth was due to multi-unit buildings. Under price pressure, on the backdrop of restricted wage growth and a contractionary macro-economic outlook, it remains most likely that for the near future we’ll continue to see more interest in the latter. Another connected issue is that of internal mobility, with migration from rural to urban areas in search for education and economic opportunities, increasing demand for denser residential construction.

Smaller homes. While the mean area in permits remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2025, there is a historical precedent in economic downturns leading to smaller homes being built so as to increase accessibility. Since the economic outlook for the year seems to have worsened, this could be the case again in 2026.


Increased reliance on mortgage loans. Despite the highest interest rates seen in a decade, the volume of new mortgage loans increased dramatically in 2024 and 2025. While some of this could be blamed on higher home prices, there remains a major portion that cannot be explained by price or transaction dynamics. Thus, it is quite likely that it reflects a reduced ability to buy homes without applying for a loan. This is also evidenced by the fact that the share of the population currently housed in a dwelling that was purchased with a mortgage loan grew steadily from a low of 0.5% in 2007, to 1.5% in 2024 (source: Eurostat). This could have been further boosted by the expected drop in interest rates as inflation seemed to be heading in the right direction. However, as of March 2026, this seems less likely, as the conflict in Iran would lead to another energy-led inflation event. Nonetheless, with real wages on the decline, mortgage loans will continue to be relied on for boosting home affordability.

Slovenia’s housing squeeze no one can measure

Written by Dr Aleš Pustovrh – Bogatin, EECFA Slovenia

Slovenia’s housing market is in a curious state. Prices for both new and existing homes keep rising, yet the country still lacks a reliable measure of how far supply trails demand. Official data show steady appreciation across all major cities—Ljubljana most of all—while construction remains hampered by slow permitting, high input costs and a fragmented building industry. Politicians promise a surge in public and affordable housing but estimates of the true shortfall—whether based on household formation, demographics or unmet rental demand—are patchy and inconsistent. The average price per square metre has jumped by roughly 50% since 2021, but the structural imbalance behind this surge is harder to pin down, leaving policymakers to grapple with a problem they can only describe vaguely.

Ljubljana, Slovenia. Photo by Alexander Nadrilyanski on pexels.com

With a general election looming in March 2026, the absence of clear data creates fertile ground for confusion and political spin. The ruling coalition boasts of raising annual public‑housing investment to €100mn, pledging €1bn over the next decade. The public housing fund plans around 2,000 new units in the coming years, with perhaps 1,000 more from other public bodies. Private developers, especially in Ljubljana, are building briskly, too. Given that Slovenia completes about 5,000 homes a year, these additions ought to shift the market—at least in theory.

But the scale of need remains uncertain. In 2021 Slovenia counted 864,300 dwellings for 859,782 households—roughly one per household. Prices, though rising fast, remain below those in some neighbouring countries. The median price of used homes was €3,070 per square metre (nearly €5,000 in Ljubljana), while the average gross monthly wage was €2,500—yielding a price‑to‑income ratio lower than in many EU states. Mortgage credit is widely available and relatively cheap, with interest rates well below 4%. Outstanding housing loans rose from €8.5bn to more than €9bn in 2025, suggesting that many households are managing their residential construction investments without state support.

One of the outgoing government’s flagship measures—a clampdown on short‑term rentals—was meant to push more homes into the long‑term market. It may instead swell the ranks of empty properties: around 19% of dwellings already stand vacant. A straightforward remedy, a property tax to nudge owners to rent out unused homes, was avoided for fear of angering voters in a country where 75% of households own their homes.

The lack of solid data allows politicians to champion measures unlikely to achieve their stated aims, while sidestepping those that might work but would prove unpopular. Election season is rarely conducive to sober policymaking, but the next government will need better data—and the courage to act on it—if it hopes to make any meaningful dent in Slovenia’s housing woes.

More on Slovenia’s housing market and housing forecast up to 2027 can be found in the EECFA Slovenia Construction Forecast Report. Sample report and orders: https://eecfa.com/

EECFA 2025 Winter Construction Forecast

EECFA released its 2025 Winter construction forecast on 12 December. Check out a sample report and place your order on eecfa.com. For discount, please contact us.

Southeast European construction markets

Bulgaria’s total construction output is forecasted to increase by 3% on average for 2026-2027” – says Yasen Georgiev at Economic Policy Institute (EPI), EECFA’s Bulgarian research institute. He adds that this is to follow estimates for a similar performance of almost 3% in 2025. The sectoral background, however, shows, a nuanced picture – cooling of residential construction, positive news from non-residential and a robust performance of civil engineering. The latter will benefit from investments which will be backed by the absorption of EU funds through the Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP) and classical operational programmes, both with implementation deadlines in 2026 and 2027. At the same time, Bulgaria’s economy is to expand by 2.4% on average in 2026-2027 – a period continuously shaped also by the Euro adoption on 1 January 2026.

Michael Glazer (SEE Regional Advisors) and Tatjana Halapija (Nada Projekt), EECFA’s Croatian members, think that declining dwelling sales in Croatia have, paradoxically, failed to stop the growth in the value of Croatian residential output, because increases in the price per square meter of those dwellings that do get sold have more than compensated for the lower number of square meters bought. “But how long this can continue is unclear” – they add. “The policies that the Croatian government is implementing in order to ease the country’s housing crisis are confusing the residential picture still more, since a number of those policies have contradictory effects on output. As to non-residential building construction, output growth during the period covered by the current forecast will depend greatly on the sector, with some likely to continue to benefit from catch-up growth and EU support for a bit longer and others moving toward a steady state or even a decline. In civil engineering, EU funds continue to play the dominant role in financing construction of all sorts. Sports facility construction is experiencing a boom, but given the speed with which such projects are completed, the effect on output will be relatively brief. Renewable energy construction should be growing rapidly, but regulators’ hostility toward the sector are holding it back.”

Romania’s economy is entering a challenging period as the recently implemented measures to reduce the national account deficit begin to take effect” – reports Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug, EECFA’s Romanian researcher at Ebuild. “While most forecasters do not anticipate a recession, economic growth is expected to remain subdued over the next two years. Inflation is the highest in the EU, boosted in 2025 by increases in sales taxes. As a result, consumer prices are rising at a pace that is forecasted to outstrip wage growth, leading to a decline in real incomes in both 2025 and 2026. Government spending is also facing cuts, thus both private and public consumption are predicted to decline, with a chilling effect on most construction activity types. There is also the challenge of the massive level of public investment required by civil engineering projects that have started since 2023, which will be difficult to sustain under the austerity and the mounting pressure of losing even more EU funding. On the brighter side, both the economy at large and the labour market are expected to be quite resilient. By 2027, assuming the deficit reaches manageable levels, the effects of contractionary policies should fade out, inflation could ease, and interest rates could come down. This means that demand for construction would rebound and with it, construction activity.”

Dejan Krajinović, EECFA’s Serbian researcher (Beobuild) says that “Serbia’s overall construction output sank into a negative territory in 2025, primarily owing to the weaker performance in civil engineering. This year recorded growth in building construction, but the substantial consolidation in civil engineering dragged totals in red. The completion of major road, railway and energy projects contributed mostly, but delayed construction starts played a role as well. Residential construction is stable and is on historical levels, while non-residential construction is booming led by the hosting of the EXPO 2027 in Belgrade. Investments into commercial, hotel and office buildings are all spurred by the event, with the purposely built EXPO 2027 complex consisting of numerous venues being the single largest investment in non-residential. Improving financial conditions and sustained demand still support relatively high construction activity, but a lot of global political and economic uncertainties are dimming future prospects.”

Dr. Aleš Pustovrh at Bogatin, EECFA Slovenia, says that Slovenia’s construction sector is holding steady at EUR 6bn, though growth has cooled. Residential buildings remain the anchor, with output expected to show only a slight dip in 2025, helped by strong employment, rising wages and cheaper mortgages. Property transactions rebounded in early 2025, reversing last year’s slump, while prices continue to climb amid land shortages and slow permitting. Public housing programmes are ambitious, but private developers are concentrating on Ljubljana and coastal towns. Non-residential construction is mixed: offices are recovering slowly, retail stays subdued, but industrial and warehousing thrive on export demand and automation while health and education remain at very high levels. Civil engineering and public works lean on EU-backed projects and are anticipated to reach historically high levels by 2026. 

Eastern European construction markets

Andrey Vakulenko at Macon, EECFA’s Russian research institute notes that “the high key rate and the overall economic slowdown are constraining the Russian construction industry with negative trends expected for the current year and over the next two years. An easing of monetary policy, which has already begun, could help normalize the situation, but a positive effect is not expected until 2027. The main drag on construction output will likely be the residential subsector where high rates and revised government demand support principles are reducing activity among both buyers and developers. Negative trends will also likely persist in most non-residential segments due to declining growth rates of budget financing, a general decrease in business activity and a slowdown in consumption. The overall descending dynamics in the construction market may somewhat be mitigated by stable growth in civil engineering driven by export projects in energy and transport, but this growth is not predicted to be enough to keep the construction market in a positive zone”.

Prof. Ali Türel, EECFA’s Turkish researcher, reports that “the major effect of inflation-curb policies in Türkiye is the decline in disposable income and in the purchasing power of wage earners and pensioners. The moderate to lower-income population is unlikely to save enough equity for buying a home when rents have also become unaffordable for many. Ironically, housing sales have been increasing at a much higher rate than the growth of households. This can be attributed to the typical trend in Türkiye, where, during inflation, people expect a higher real return on their financial assets from real estate investments compared to alternative investment options. The reconstruction of earthquake-damaged buildings and infrastructure also contributed to the high rate of growth in building starts and completions from Q2 2025 onward, leading to the highest rates of change in the construction sector’s contribution to GDP compared to other sectors. Our latest forecast indicates that total construction output in Türkiye may reach 6.4 trillion TL in 2027 (EUR 180 billion), all at 2024 prices.”

According to Prof. Sergii Zapototskyi of Uvecon, EECFA Ukraine, despite the war and high risks, Ukraine’s construction industry remains one of the key drivers of economic recovery in 2025. The RDNA4 (the latest Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment Report) estimates Ukraine’s reconstruction needs for the next decade to be USD 486-524 billion, creating long-term demand for residential, non-residential and civil engineering construction works. Major challenges persist, including the uncertainty regarding the duration of the war, especially in frontline regions, labour shortages, bureaucratic barriers in the urban planning legislation, and logistical constraints due to the relocation of production facilities, and often, shortages in building materials. At the same time, the industry is demonstrating resilience: developers are diversifying supply chains, stabilizing procurement schedules, and increasing activity in the Central and Western regions. Demand for housing, intensive infrastructure restoration, and international investment from the EBRD, EIB, and other partners continue to support positive dynamics. The sector’s development prospects for 2026-2027 will largely depend on the security situation and the effectiveness of state recovery programs.

Housing needs of internally displaced persons in Ukraine

Written by Sergii Zapototskyi – UVECON, EECFA Ukraine

The full-scale invasion of Russia caused a deep humanitarian crisis and exacerbated socio-economic disparities in Ukraine. One of the key challenges is to provide homes for internally displaced persons (IDPs). The mass movement of the population created a shortage of affordable and temporary housing as the infrastructure was not ready for such a load. The government is already working on a new housing policy, which might also help resolve the issue of housing for IDPs.

Source: https://www.ioc.gov.ua/analytics/dashboard-vpo

Statistics on internally displaced persons

As of 1 November, this year, 4,588,045 internally displaced persons were officially registered in Ukraine, including 838,436 children under the age of 18 [1]. Most IDPS are in Kharkiv region (508 thousand or 11%), followed by Dnipropetrovsk region (467 thousand or 10%), the city of Kyiv (430 thousand or 9.4%) and Kyiv region (232 thousand or 5%). [3]. IDPs in these regions total about 1.6 million people [1]. As per the result of the 16th round of the survey conducted by The International Organization for Migration (IOM, UN Migration), as of April 2024, about 2.7 million internally displaced people were from frontline areas.

Housing damages, needs and solutions

In total, more than 1.3 million Ukrainian households lost their homes because of the war, including not only IDPs, but also residents of settlements that suffered extensive destruction. The World Bank estimates total housing needs in Ukraine between 2025 and 2035 to be USD 86 billion, mostly to finance repair and reconstruction works of the housing stock (estimated at USD 75.5 billion including the cost of clearing rubble at USD 5.7 billion). USD 404.6 million should go to acute housing needs and funding has also been identified for organizational measures (USD 37.5 million) and regulatory and technical processes, including the development of strategies (USD 12.5 million) to coordinate and implement reconstruction programs [4].

Citizens have already submitted over 850,000 reports of housing damage through the Diia app (the national public-services portal) totalling over 60 million sqm of losses. For comparison, in the pre-war period, an average of 9-10 million sqm of homes were completed in Ukraine each year, demonstrating the scale of challenge and need for multi-level solutions in housing policy. Preferential lending programs are unable to solve this situation and cover the housing needs. The ‘jeOselia’ program provided loans worth over UAH 28 billion, but 52% of this went to military personnel, while IDPs received only 566 pieces of loans. In 2024, within the framework of this 3% mortgage program, only 500 families were provided with housing. The situation is even more critical in the rental market as the state program for subsidizing rental housing has shown low efficiency. The majority of IDPs (90-95%) rent homes unofficially, making them vulnerable to unreliable living conditions and unjustified rental charge increases or evictions.

Modular settlement, Borodianka. Photo: Sergii Zapototskyi

Modular settlements are a key temporary housing for IDPs, although living conditions here cannot be considered fully comfortable. Initially, they were meant to be short-term but gradually became long-term housing for many families due to their limited finances. Today, besides the psychological difficulties and discomfort of residents, operating such facilities is also a major challenge. The maintenance of modular settlements, including payment for utilities, repairs and security, falls entirely on local budgets, an additional financial burden for communities which often do not have enough resources to sustainably finance these.

Modular settlement, Bucha. Photo: Sergii Zapototskyi

Housing policy changes

As the problem of providing housing for IDPs is systemic in nature and cannot be solved solely through financial instruments, a comprehensive review of state housing policy has become necessary, particularly the development of an affordable rental housing segment, social programs, and long-term support mechanisms for both IDPs and vulnerable categories of the population in general.

The Ukrainian Parliament is already working on several key legislative initiatives. The central one is draft law No. 12377 ‘On the Basic Principles of Housing Policy’ to replace the current Housing Code from 1983 which does not contain basic concepts for modern housing policy such as social rental housing or housing stock of communal ownership. Draft law No. 4080 is also important on the inventory of the housing stock. In parallel with drafting these laws, necessary by-laws are being prepared to regulate the practical mechanisms for implementing housing policy (creation and maintenance of housing queues, criteria for selecting recipients of state support, and the procedure of providing various forms of housing assistance). In addition, the government’s plans until 2027 include allocating EUR 650 million to the eRecovery Program, EUR 450 million to support IDPs, military personnel and the families of the deceased, creating a social housing fund and introducing a unified state online system for the long-term strategy of social integration and support for vulnerable categories of the population. All this might help resolve housing for IDPs.

Sources:

  1. Internally Displaced Persons. State Enterprise “Information and Computing Center of the Ministry of Social Policy, Family and Unity of Ukraine”: https://www.ioc.gov.ua/analytics/dashboard-vpo
  2. Housing crisis in Ukraine: how to provide IDPs with housing in 2025? International Renaissance Foundation: https://www.irf.ua/zhytlova-kryza-v-ukrayini-yak-zabezpechyty-vpo-zhytlom-u-2025-roczi/
  3. Internal Displacement Report, IOM Ukraine: https://dtm.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1461/files/reports/IOM_UKR_GPS_Internal%20Displacement%20Report_Round%2016_UA_June%202024.pdf
  4. Rapid Assessment of Damage and Recovery Needs RDNA4, World Bank Group: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099052925103531065/pdf/P180174-93c8e8c1-83a2-487d-aaec-a8435f9db418.pdf  
  5. Cedos, Housing and Residential Conditions in Ukraine: Survey Results, 2024: https://cedos.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/zhytlo-ta-zhytlovi-umovy-ukrayin_ok_rezultaty-opytuvannya.pdf

Aparthotels: new growth spot for non-residential construction in Russia

Written by Andrey Vakulenko – MACON, EECFA Russia

Russia’s resort real estate market has seen a dynamic growth in recent years, partly due to the emergence of aparthotels – a format attractive to both developers and hotel operators. The coming years are also expected to see a sharp increase in aparthotel construction, supporting the non-residential construction market – according to Andrey Vakulenko, EECFA’s Russian analyst.

Thriving aparthotel segment

Resort real estate has been one of the fastest-growing segments of the Russian construction market in recent years. Aparthotels – apartment complexes with minimal infrastructure and services, and with the mandatory availability of a trust management – have particularly seen a rapid growth, though they are relatively new to the Russian market. The core of the supply is (and will be) resort projects, i.e. aparthotels in locations with developed recreational and tourist infrastructure for seasonal vacations. Urban aparthotels – primarily in metropolitan areas with minimal infrastructure – are rather aimed at business travelers and to a lesser extent at traditional tourism and long-term rentals.

As of Q3 2025, the aparthotel market size stood at 25,200 units with a total area of ​​612,500 sqm and by the end of this year, roughly 143,000 sqm of new aparthotels, or 4,300 new units are expected to open. Based on the announced plans, the next three to four years will register a sharp rise, and by the end of 2029 aparthotels may amount to around 109,800 units with over 3.6 million sqm, almost six times higher than the current level.

Behind the growth

One of the main reasons for the anticipated expansion of the aparthotel format is that domestic tourism gained popularity after 2022 due to the reduced accessibility of many international resorts (because of the suspension of air travel, the weak ruble, visa issues, and other internal or external restrictions). Rise in domestic tourism created stable high demand for accommodation in virtually all key resorts in Russia.

Another reason is that developers specialized in multi-unit residential construction began to start many projects in aparthotel and resort real estate construction amid the decline in the residential real estate market following the cancellation of the mass preferential mortgage program.

Also, there are significant incentives and state support for developing tourism infrastructure and the domestic tourism industry, including the construction of hotel complexes and aparthotels.

Furthermore, in 2024 the status of aparthotels was legalized; they were included in the official hotel classification system, creating uniform standards for the segment and transparent conditions for market participants.

Besides, the departure of many large foreign hotel operators from the market in 2022 led to the expansion of Russian hotel chains (Azimut Hotels, Cosmos Hotel Group, Alean Collection, ZONT Hotel Group, VALO Hotel Services, Mantera Group, among others), which began collaborating with aparthotels, increasing the latter’s attractiveness and guaranteeing a high level of service and trust management services.

Moreover, many investors appeared in the market who found the trust management model used in aparthotels and the opportunity of generating passive income attractive. The operating return on investments in aparthotels in developed resorts managed by well-known hotel brands can reach 7%-10% and higher. And given the rise in the market value of apartments, long-term returns can reach 13%-17% per annum, exceeding the return on long-term bank deposits (currently 8%-10% per year for a three-year deposit).

All this suggests that aparthotels will be a major segment of non-residential construction in the coming years.

Coastal regions: top locations for aparthotels

The aparthotel format is developing most actively on the Black Sea coast, currently accounting for over half of the total supply in this segment. Urban aparthotels are primarily in Moscow and St. Petersburg with just over one-fifth of the total supply.

In the coming years, it is also the Black Sea coast that will likely register the biggest expansion in supply, but new aparthotels are also set to be actively emerging on the Caspian Sea coast, in Dagestan.

In coastal regions (Krasnodar Krai, Crimea, Dagestan), aparthotels under construction already amount to more than a quarter of all multi-unit residential real estate under construction and this figure is expected to grow further.

There is also an increase in the construction of similar projects in other resorts across the country, for example, on the Baltic coast or at mountain and spa resorts in the North Caucasus, the Altai Mountains and the Urals, among others.

EXPO 2027 boosts Serbian non-residential construction

Written by Dejan Krajinović, Beobuild Core d.o.o., EECFA Serbia

Overall construction output in Serbia is expected to decline this year, primarily due to the slowdown in civil engineering as several major road and railway projects were completed last year. By contrast, non-residential construction has entered a new growth cycle driven by investments connected to the hosting of EXPO 2027 in Belgrade. The event will be held in a purpose-built exhibition complex in the outskirts of the city, covering around 80 hectares. Alongside the construction of this complex, numerous public and private investments are indirectly tied to the event, including new hotels, accommodation, leisure, and commercial projects, as well as the reconstruction of museums, cultural heritage sites, and public spaces.

Aerial photo of the construction site of the EXPO 2027 complex – Photo: beobuild.rs

The EXPO 2027 complex itself is a vast construction site, comprising approximately 230,000 sqm of exhibition pavilions, multifunctional venues, congress and conference halls, as well as office and retail space. In addition, a residential complex with around 1,500 units is being built to house participating delegations. The exhibition will run for 93 days, from 15 May to 15 August 2027, featuring around 130 countries and hundreds of events spanning sports, science, culture, and innovation. Total investment could exceed EUR 2.5 billion, with EUR 1.5 billion allocated for the EXPO complex and a further EUR 1 billion for accompanying facilities and infrastructure. This project has been the key driver of growth in non-residential construction and is expected to sustain activity in the sector in the coming years.

The broader development zone around the EXPO 2027 complex extends far beyond the exhibition center itself. While the core site covers 80 hectares, total development area exceeds 200 hectares. It will include the new National Stadium complex, a center for aquatic sports, a theme park, recreation facilities, and hotels. The National Stadium alone is a EUR 600 million project, designed with 52,000 permanent seats and the capacity to expand by an additional 8,000. Construction began in early 2024 and, despite delays, it is expected to be completed in time for 2027. Other sporting and leisure facilities are also planned for delivery ahead of the event, though it remains uncertain whether all projects will meet the deadline.

Several other public and private developments across Belgrade are linked to the exhibition, including the reconstruction and expansion of museum facilities: a new Natural History Museum building, the relocation of the Nikola Tesla Museum, the renovation of the Aeronautical Museum, and the modernization of the City of Belgrade Museum, among others. The private sector is likewise preparing for the anticipated rise in visitors, with investments in accommodation accelerating. Notable projects under construction include new hotels under the Intercontinental and Ritz-Carlton brands, alongside numerous smaller ventures.

However, the high level of spending on the EXPO 2027 has placed considerable strain on the state budget. To maintain fiscal deficits at around 3% of GDP, funds have been reallocated from other public projects. This has been most evident in infrastructure development and civil engineering, where shifting priorities have led to significant delays on major planned projects. As a result, civil engineering output is contracting faster than expected in 2025, with negative implications for growth in 2026 as well. On the other hand, long-term economic benefits of hosting EXPO 2027 remain uncertain.

After the event concludes, the EXPO 2027 complex will be repurposed as the new Belgrade Fair Complex. The current fairgrounds in central Belgrade, built in the 1950s, are planned for redevelopment once operations move to the new site. This ensures that the EXPO facilities will continue to be used in the years ahead, supporting the economic rationale for the project. Moreover, new transport infrastructure, including a railway link to the city center, river dock facilities, and expanded commercial developments, should further enhance the attractiveness of the location for private investment.