Written by Andrey Vakulenko – MACON, EECFA Russia
As the residential real estate market in Russia continues to struggle with high key rates and expensive mortgages, the main question in the coming years is not so much the expected rate of reduction, but the speed of this reduction and how quickly market mortgages can replace shrinking preferential programmes. Based on data from ten major think tanks, MACON has compiled a consensus forecast for the multi-unit housing market over the next five years.
Fundamental framework for the housing market in the coming years remains quite conservative
Key forecasters—the Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Economic Development—both predict that inflation will gradually decline, but at high stakes, causing a general economic cooling and minimal growth in the coming years. Expected GDP growth in 2026 is to be 0%-1% annualised, accelerating to 1.5%-2.5% in 2027-2028.
The key rate is forecasted to average 14.6% in 2026, with a further decline to 10.5%-12.5% in 2027 and to around 9% in 2028. In early 2026 a more pronounced rate cut was expected, but by July the trajectory of monetary policy easing had become noticeably more restrained. Inflation is falling at a slower pace than planned, so the Central Bank is also lowering the rate more slowly.
Market mortgage rates will also likely decline, but gradually rather than sharply, which is crucial for the housing market: the cost of financing remains one of the main factors determining home purchases.
Baseline consensus forecast for the multi-unit housing market
Multi-unit housing market forecasts made at the beginning of 2026 by 10 different sources have been complied: rating agencies (ACRA, Expert RA), banks (Alfa-Bank, Sovcombank), institutional companies (DOM.RF, ЕРЗ – erzrf.ru), consulting companies (Yakov and Partners, Strategy Partners, MACON) and the Centre for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (CMASF). The consensus forecast has been broken down to five key indicators: housing completions, new project starts, new mortgages, primary market sales and prices in the primary market. If we combine the forecasts for all five indicators, we get a fairly consistent picture of a gradual recovery cycle:
- 2026: stabilization – demand is to stop declining, mortgages are to begin to recover, although development activity is to remain under pressure.
- 2027: start of recovery – mortgage market may grow, demand may increase and developers may begin to start new projects more actively.
- 2028: turning point in supply and development activity – recovery in demand and new project starts should begin to be reflected in housing completion.
- 2029–2030: a period of stable growth – the rate of increase for most indicators will likely moderate and the market is likely to gradually enter a stable trajectory.
The logic here is that the recovery of the mortgage market should support demand, growth in demand would halt the shrinkage in development activity and first, new project starts would grow, and after a few years this effect would start to show in housing completion.
Prices in the primary market remain the most stable element of the forecast. There are not enough preconditions for a sharp increase, but there are no grounds for a large decrease either. High construction costs and financing costs will form the lower price limit, while limited purchasing power, amid a gradual decline in rates, will form the upper price limit.
Thus, the coming years are more likely to bring a gradual recovery than a new boom in prices and development. As the market will not return to the previous model based primarily on mass, preferential mortgages and demand will be more and more generated by market lending, the decline in key and market mortgage rates is the main factor in forecast uncertainty. So, the market remains quite sensitive to decisions in monetary and mortgage policies.
Alternative scenarios of the consensus forecast
Since the range of expert opinions on a number of indicators for 2026 turned out to be quite large, we can identify not only a basic consensus forecast, but two alternative scenarios as well. Differences between the two scenarios mainly concern 2026 as in subsequent years forecasts for most indicators converge much more closely:
- In the pessimistic scenario, demand recovery in 2026 is significantly weaker. Mortgage lending would grow by only 7%, primary market sales would drop by 13% and new project starts would fall by almost 15%, limiting growth for housing construction in 2028.
- In the optimistic scenario, more rapid monetary easing and the maintenance of the Family Mortgage Programme terms would allow the mortgage market to grow by 17%, and demand by 2%. Developers could increase new project starts by 15% as early as 2026, leading to higher growth in housing completions (about 12% in 2028).
Key indicators in the consensus forecast
Housing completion volumes are to go down by 5% in 2026 and by another 8.5% in 2027, followed by a gradual transition to growth: +3.8% in 2028 and +7.6% in 2029. Thus, 2026-2027 is a correction phase and 2028-2030 is a period of recovery in developer activity. Experts generally agree on the direction of future trends but differ on the estimates of their scale. There are two scenarios for 2028: in the positive one, completion could grow by about 12%, while in the negative one, only by 1.5%.
The highest uncertainty is in new project starts. The difference in expert estimates is based on different assumptions about developers’ reactions to the current market situation: the decision to start a new project is sensitive to demand, the cost of project financing, construction costs, and expectations of future sales. So, the divergence between the scenarios is the most noticeable here. In the optimistic one, new project starts in 2026 could grow by 15.3%, while in the pessimistic scenario, they could drop by 14.5% (the consensus is -4.6%). So, the market is at a point where developers are beginning to look beyond the current decline in demand but are not yet confident in the speed of its recovery. Starting in 2027, experts are much more unanimous in their expectations with a stable growth of 5%-10% per year.
The most positive dynamics are expected in new mortgages where the consensus forecast is +12% in 2026 and +24% in 2027, followed by +12%-13% annually in 2028-2030. However, the forecast for the current year remains less certain than expectations for 2027-2030. The optimistic scenario projects a growth of 17% in issued mortgage loans for 2026, while the pessimistic scenario projects only 7%. The difference is mainly due to the differing expectations regarding the pace of monetary easing and the availability of market mortgages. Going forward, as rates decline, market mortgages should gradually become the primary source of demand.
The consensus estimate is that primary market sales in 2026 can grow by just 1%, suggesting that rate cuts are not yet enough to fully restore demand, but experts don’t expect a further decrease. However, there is also a negative scenario: the possible tightening of the Family Mortgage Programme could lead to a drop in the number of transactions by about 13% as early as 2026. For 2027-2029, the number of transactions is to grow by 7%-9% per year, while it is to slow down to 4% in 2030.
Prices in the primary market appear to be the most stable element of the forecast. Consensus forecasts are for the price per square meter to add 6%-8% per year in 2026-2028, followed by 5%-6% per year in 2029-2030. One could ask why prices continue to rise even with limited demand. On the one hand, growth potential is limited: purchasing power remains a restraining factor, and the level of sales in projects under construction is relatively low. On the other, developers face high construction costs and high project financing. Thus, there is limited room for price reduction, and the most likely scenario is a moderate nominal price growth without a sharp acceleration.
How does the forecast compare with the reality so far?
Based on the results of H1 2026, actual demand almost perfectly matched the consensus forecast. This applies to both primary transaction volume and the mortgage market.
Price dynamics are also relatively close to the forecast range, although the direction is still different: experts anticipated moderate price growth by the end of the year, while the first half of the year showed a nominal negative correction.
Development activity is better than expected. Both housing completions and new project starts showed growth between January and June 2026 despite the consensus forecast for a moderate decline for the year. The discrepancy in multi-unit housing completions is particularly noticeable: the actual dynamics of H1 exceeded even the most optimistic expectations.
Yet, as the first-half-year results are not representative of the year and some indicators exhibit significant seasonality, it doesn’t mean that the forecast needs to be fully revised. It indicates though that market supply is demonstrating greater resilience than hoped for.
Methodological approach to the consensus forecast
The methodology is based on the median of all available forecast estimates for each indicator. The median was chosen deliberately: unlike the mean, it is resistant to outliers and better suited to the real estate market where expert estimates often greatly differ.
To assess the extent to which experts agree with each other, the interquartile range (IQR) is used—the difference between the third and first quartiles of the sample. It shows how widely opinions differ regarding the central range of forecasts. The smaller the IQR, the greater the agreement among opinions and the greater our confidence in the consensus estimate. The assumptions used to interpret the results were: IQR < 3%: very high predictive certainty; 3–6%: high predictive certainty; 6–10%: moderate;10–15%: low; over 15%: very low.
Where consensus estimates are low, the consensus forecast is supplemented with optimistic and pessimistic scenarios constructed based on the upper (third) and lower (first) quartiles, respectively (the optimistic scenario focuses on the upper part of the expert estimate range, while the pessimistic scenario focuses on the lower one). This way, uncertainty can be conveyed through a single figure, and a realistic range of possible market development can be shown.
This article is based on the consensus forecast of MACON, ACRA, Expert RA, Alfa-Bank, Sovcombank, DOM.RF, ЕРЗ – erzrf.ru, Yakov and Partners, Strategy Partners and CMAS. More detailed forecasts for the Russian residential market and other subsectors of construction can be found in the EECFA Forecast Report up to 2028. Orders: eecfa.com


















