Bucharest’s drop in residential permit and completion

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug – Ebuild srl, EECFA Romania

Reading the recent blog post regarding permit and completion data one can see that the trend for residential permits in Romania seems to have taken a downturn since 2021, and this naturally raises the questions: What has happened? Has the market peaked or is it just a temporary setback?

The supply-side story

In order to attempt answering these questions, Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug, EECFA’s researcher on Romania, started by looking at permit data for a longer period and split by regions. The slowdown in 2023 and 2024 was present in most regions, but none of them was hit as hard as Bucharest where the useful area in residential permits nearly halved in 2024 compared to the peak of 2022. Thus, whatever effect led to the drop in permits, it disproportionately affected Bucharest.  While it remains by far the most active region, the drop is oversized when adjusted for its share of the market.

In case of Bucharest, a non-trivial amount of this effect could be explained by the gridlock in the urban planning area, with permits for all types of construction hindered by the cancellation in 2022 of the existing zoning plans which have yet to be replaced by newer versions. This makes it more difficult to gain permits for new developments, and could be, at least partly responsible, for the observed shrinkage in residential permits in the last two years.  

Figure 1: Useful area in residential permits, 2015-2024, Bucharest-Ilfov chart presented outside the map due to relative market size (Source: own calculations based on NSI data)

The next logical step seemed to be looking at other indicators such as completions and seeing what happened there. Indeed, they have also been on the decline with the number of completed homes country-wide in 2024 being comparable to that of 2018. Again, Bucharest-Ilfov saw a much larger drop in 2024 over the 2021 figures, standing at –33% compared to –12% in the rest of the country. 

Figure 2: Home completions between 2015-2024 (Source: own calculations based on NSI data)

The decline is quite apparent in the supply of new housing overall, but that the situation is much more dire in Bucharest.

The demand-side story

Could the decrease in supply be a response to lower demand? After all, if developers have difficulties selling stock, they are unlikely to start new projects.

Looking at the number of transactions, they indeed declined overall in 2024 compared to the peak of 2021, but the effect was much smaller with just around 10% fewer properties being sold in the whole country, while in the Bucharest-Ilfov region there was barely any change (-0.3%).

At the same time, prices of homes continued growing, but this time Bucharest (+20%) lagged behind the country (+27%), meaning that the price gap between the capital and the rest of the country is slowly closing.

Figure 3: Number of real estate transactions between 2017 and 2024 (Source: own calculations based on ANCPI data)

However, when comparing the growth in home prices to that of the rise in construction costs, the situation looks more dire. As of 2024, residential construction costs grew 41% over the 2021 level, far outpacing the increase in prices. This was partly due to increased materials costs (+32%), but also due to much higher labor costs (+60%) for construction workers. Since in January 2025 tax breaks for construction workers were eliminated and the minimum wage for them grew, it’s unlikely for the situation to improve in the short term, potentially discouraging developers from new investments until prices reach a place where they offset the costs and offer similar margins as before.

What does this mean for housing affordability?

This topic was touched upon last year, in another blogpost, with the conclusion that it is useful to look at affordability from two standpoints: cash buyers and mortgage takers, since increased interest rates can negate the effects of wage growth.

Taking a regional split into account this time, it’s noticeable, and perhaps slightly surprising that homes are more affordable in Bucharest as the wage gap between it and the country average is higher than the residential prices gap.

This took a turn, however, in 2024 as home affordability in Bucharest started to drop, while the national average remained more or less the same. If the previously mentioned issues that limit permitting are not resolved, we can expect this trend to continue in the future as well since a limited supply will mean higher prices.

Another factor that could limit future supply, at a national level, is developer funding. It used to be the case that developers would focus on presales and use very high downpayments in the project phase (up to 90% in some cases) to fund the construction work, without requiring a bank loan.

Since a high-profile scandal regarding a large developer brought this issue into the limelight, confidence in this type of arrangement has declined and buyers are less likely to accept paying high downpayments before construction has even started. Concurrently, there is a bill underway aiming to limit downpayments for unfinished buildings to 10%. Should developers resort to banking loans for their projects, it would make the market more stable but more expensive for them, leading to either lower margins, or higher prices.

Figure 4: Home affordability for cash buyers: sqm in an average 2-room apartment one could afford with average monthly net wage (Source: own calculations based on data from NSI and imobiliare.ro)

When it comes to home affordability for those using a mortgage loan, things are not looking better than they did last year. Inflation has proved to be stickier than expected, and the Central Bank is lowering reference interest rates slowly, meaning mortgages will continue to be relatively expensive in the near future.

While the higher wages in the capital again prove to be an advantage, making homes slightly more affordable than for the average Romanian, this indicator was also on the decline in 2024 for Bucharest, and stable for the rest, shrinking the gap between the two.

Figure 5: Home affordability for mortgage buyers: size of the home (in sqm) one could afford to buy with a mortgage loan, assuming a 25% downpayment, a 30-year term and a debt-to-income ratio of 40% of the average monthly net wage (Source: own calculations based on data from NBR, NSI and imobiliare.ro).

In the context of high energy costs, in 2021 construction costs increased. Since then, the situation has not improved dramatically, and it’s unlikely to change in the near future as inflation and high wage growth will keep an upwards pressure on them in 2025 as well.

Bucharest is doubly feeling the pain when it comes to new residential development. Adding to high construction costs, there are issues with urban zoning and permits approvals. The supply constraints mean higher prices, leading to slightly declining home affordability, especially for those relying on mortgages.

Figure 6: Construction costs for residential buildings (Source: own calculations based on data from NSI)

Forecast for the Romanian residential market is available in the EECFA Forecast Report. EECFA conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries, including Romania. Contact us for orders and sample report

EECFA 2024 Winter Construction Forecast

Posted on by efalucskai

EECFA released its 2024 Winter construction forecast on 16 December. Check out a sample report and purchase any of the 8 reports or the package of 8 reports at eecfa.com. For discounts, contact us.

Southeast European construction markets

Total construction output in Bulgaria is forecasted to grow by an average of 3.3% in 2024-2026, which is slightly above real GDP growth projections for the same period. The subsector breakdown shows that residential construction is expected to lose momentum, but this is likely to be compensated by a more dynamic performance of non-residential construction and civil engineering. In parallel, general economic activity in Bulgaria in the forecast period is to be influenced by the effects from the full membership in the Schengen area from 2025 onward and the prospects for the country to introduce the euro on 1 January 2026.

Croatian building construction presents a varied picture across subsectors, with anticipated output growth ranging from significantly positive to somewhat negative. Civil engineering is more uniformly positive, but certain sectors show the effects of the completion and commencement of large projects. Both building and civil engineering output growth will be strongly influenced by new government laws and regulations, the consequences of which, while likely to be large, are difficult to predict for both the short and medium terms. These include the new National Housing Policy Plan until 2030, the new tax on real estate and measures to balance the playing field between different types of tourism accommodations.

Despite the rise in investment, Romania will likely continue to see a stifled growth in construction in real terms due to costs remaining high. Stubborn inflation and the slightly disappointing macroeconomic performance combined with increased wages and still high interest rates create a less appealing environment for investors in building construction. On the bright side, high income and importsare indicative of strong demand for consumption and could translate to demand for construction. While infrastructure did well, the current political turmoil and uncertainty could hobble performance going forwards. Even assuming deficit remains high but stable, as the EC expects, it would continue to raise public debt and make financing further projects more politically difficult. As some downside factors could improve by then, construction growth is forecasted to return to positive in 2026.

Serbia’s construction is likely to have closed another strong year led by civil engineering, but non-residential also entered a new growth cycle with positive outlook boosted by public investments and the hosting of the EXPO 2027 in Belgrade. The construction of commercial, office and hotel buildings are all set to grow in the coming period, followed by education and health. Residential construction is already on historically high levels with a relatively stable performance. In civil engineering, road and railway construction continues unabated, breaking new record volumes on the way, but other segments also have an impressive project pipeline. The economy is set to expand by 4% in 2024 and 2025 on the back of strong consumption and high investment, so construction outputs may sustain formidable levels up to 2026.

Slovenia’s construction sector is expected to maintain post-pandemic levels with annual output consistently exceeding EUR 5 billion up to 2026 against the EUR 3 billion pre-pandemic. Public financing has been a key driver with national budget expenditure up from EUR 10 billion in 2019 to over EUR 15 billion in 2024, though there will be spending limits in 2025-2026. Civil engineering in the forecast period will be supported by major infrastructure projects. Residential construction is set to drop slightly first in 2024 before rebounding by 2026 driven by lower mortgage rates. Non-residential construction is forecast to grow steadily but remain dependant on the availability of public financing. Other challenges remain such as labour shortages, permit backlogs and high costs, but construction cost growth is set to stabilize at under 3% annually.

Eastern European construction markets

In 2024, the Russian construction industry fared better than previously expected driven by the high pace of project implementation and the massive budget support in civil engineering and non-residential construction. It could even offset the negative impacts of the decline in housing construction caused by the end of the mass preferential mortgage program. However, this positive momentum is expected to gradually fade owing to the tight monetary policy of the Central Bank and several other internal and external factors that are slowing down the economy in general and the construction industry in particular. In 2025-2026, the record budget expenditures planned within the framework of new national projects and other measures of state financing will likely maintain construction market volumes in Russia in the positive territory, but with minimal growth.

In Türkiye, increased interest rates and the Central Bank’s policy to reduce the depreciation of the national currency to curb inflation has not yet produced the intended outcomes. And high interest rates are blamed for shrinking industrial output and decelerated trade growth. The interest rate and the Central Bank’s policies had two major effects on the construction sector: big negative real rates of change in construction costs and housing prices. Housing sales are growing as real prices drop and rely on equity financing since mortgage loans have become unaffordable at high interest rates. Building permits in most segments decreased in Q3 2024, while completions had a positive trend. The government’s legal obligation to rebuild the earthquake-damaged 350 thousand buildings with 870 thousand independent units has been the main factor in huge budget deficits that impede the Government from providing sufficient funds for civil engineering projects.

As a consequence of the war ongoing for over 1000 days, Ukraine’s construction market is facing economic difficulties, limited resources, huge losses in buildings, hike in building material prices, lack of skilled workers and limited access to financing, topped with the unpredictability of government decisions and the instability of property rights. The destroyed homes of more than 1.5 million families create a huge demand. Non-residential construction also focuses on the restoration of destroyed buildings and the construction of new ones in safer central and western regions. Civil engineering is also boosted by the renovation of bridges, roads, railways, pipelines, communication and power lines. The ‘Unified portfolio of public investment projects’ recently approved by the government includes 750 big reconstruction projects on roughly UAH 2.36 trillion, while the state budget also has UAH 256.1 billion for public projects in 2025. First, the EUR 50 billion under the EU’s Ukraine Facility are to be used. Financing is also planned through international financial organizations and foreign governments. The priority is energy, transport, utility and public buildings such as schools.

Life after the preferential mortgage scheme in Russia

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Andrey Vakulenko – MACON, EECFA Russia

The biggest preferential mortgage scheme in the history of Russia, a temporary response to the pandemic in 2020, lasted much longer than planned. The market got accustomed to relatively low rates, prices rose sharply, and mortgages became the main tool for purchasing homes. However, external conditions changed dramatically in the meantime, and this summer the program was phased out. Housing demand immediately collapsed, and the main question now is whether the market will be able to find balance, or the current problems are just the beginning of a major crisis.

The saga of the preferential mortgage scheme

Even though the Russian housing market developed well in the pre-pandemic period, in 2020 the pandemic (lockdown, decline in the economy and in the population’s income) threatened the construction industry. Hence the state program to subsidize mortgage rates. Such programs existed before but only targeted certain groups (e.g. families with children). The new scheme in 2020 was large-scale with no restriction on the type of buyer and was to support demand and ensure stability in the housing market that is one of the key construction segments in Russia.

But good intentions soon turned into problems. The impact of preferential mortgages on demand was disproportionately big: buyer activity soared against the backdrop of a relatively short lockdown and a more-favorable-than-initially-expected dynamics of the economy during the pandemic. Increased demand led to a surge in the cost per square meter. Many investors took out mortgages to make money on rapidly rising prices. Initial savings on loan interest at the start of the program were quickly exhausted due to growing prices. Eventually, the preferential mortgage program, designed to support the solvency of home buyers, reached the exact opposite: it sharply reduced the availability of new homes for them, so much so that it is now at its lowest level of the last 15 years. Another key problem was the excessive length of the scheme. It was kept in the post-pandemic period and extended several times, continuing to stimulate demand and price growth (although conditions were revised to be stringent). So, the market became dependent on state participation and ensured affordable mortgage rates for all types of buyers.

By early 2024, the preferential mortgage scheme started to show side effects such as structural market imbalances (secondary housing became significantly cheaper than primary housing as the secondary market did not have such support), increased indebtedness of the population, and the risk of a primary housing market bubble. The drawbacks of the scheme gradually began to outweigh its benefits. However, either the continuation or the abrupt phase-out of the program would have damaged the market. Yet, external conditions have become extremely difficult, and rising inflation has contributed to a sharp tightening of monetary policy. The key rate of the Central Bank of Russia has increased from 7.5% to 19% since last summer and is now at historical highs. At the start of the scheme in 2020, market mortgage rates were at 8%–9%, and the state subsidized them to 6.5%. In 2024, mortgage rates on average grew to 20%-21%, while the program allowed borrowing at 8%. Because of this, government spending on subsidizing mortgage rates under the scheme soared, and its final cancellation was only a matter of time.

What is happening now

The large-scale preferential mortgage program, officially phased out on 1 July 2024, was the most massive demand support in the history of the Russian housing market: 1.6 million loans were issued for a total of about RUB 6 trillion. Now state support for housing has become more targeted through the introduction of other mortgage programs:

  • Family Mortgage Scheme for families with children
  • IT Mortgage Scheme for employees of IT companies
  • Rural Mortgage Scheme for homes located in rural areas
  • Far Eastern Mortgage Scheme in the eastern and Arctic regions of Russia.

These, however, due to their narrower audience and stricter conditions, will not be able to fully compensate for the cancellation of the preferential mortgage program. The record high key rate makes general market rates effectively prohibitive. In monetary terms, the number of issued mortgage loans in July 2024 dived by 55% over June 2024. The volume of accumulated debt on mortgage loans this July decreased for the first time since 2019. The number of transactions in the primary market (in construction projects) sank by 51% this July against this June and continued to decline this August by another 13%.

Despite reduced demand, there is very high developer activity which has been breaking records for 7 months in a row. At the beginning of September 2024, about 117 million sqm of multi-unit residential buildings were under construction. And growth in supply amid reduced demand creates risks of market oversupply in the future.

What happens next

The end of the preferential mortgage program was planned to take place in a period of low market mortgage rates, but the gap between market rates and preferential rates had been growing steadily and reached record levels this year. Thus, due to the cancellation of preferential mortgages, demand in the market crumpled. It is aggravated by the expected continuation of a tight monetary policy, at least throughout 2025. The projected level of the key rate for this period is 14%-16%, so market mortgage rates will remain high in 2025, exerting strong downward pressure on demand.

Since the mortgage loan became the main instrument for home purchases during the scheme, demand could only be activated if we returned to those rates. The targeted mortgage programs mentioned above partly do so, but they will not be able to fully replace the large-scale preferential one. The most significant, though, Family Mortgage, was extended this July until 2030 with some restrictions: the program now applies mainly to families with a child under 6 years of age (and two other smaller groups of the population[1]). The number of families with children under 6 as per the latest census (2020) was about 7.1 million, but the number of potential borrowers until 2030 will plummet owing to the deceleration in birth rates (an average decline of 4% per year over the past 5 years) and the limitation of the program itself (it can only be used once).

Therefore, demand in the housing market does not have any clear prerequisites for growth in the coming years, and the volume of unsold supply will likely accumulate. Yet, existing schemes might develop, and new ones might be launched, which one way or another might support buyer activity and the entire residential market:

  • New targeted mortgage programs might be introduced based on professional or geographic criteria (public sector employees, representatives of professions valuable to the state, scarcely populated areas, etc). They will not carry the risks of market overheating or bubble since they exclude the purchase of homes for investment. But with high key rates, any such program requires huge state funding, so their introduction in 2024-2025 is unlikely. 
  • New payment schemes might be launched. The popularity of tranche mortgages[2] and various instalment programs is growing, and savings schemes are also being discussed (banks might introduce special target mortgage deposits on which buyers could accumulate funds for home purchases with partial co-financing from federal or regional authorities).
  • The flexibility of mortgage products might grow. Banks are starting to offer borrowers the inclusion of a clause in loan agreements to guarantee a reduction in mortgage rates when the key rate falls. That is, if the key rate drops in the duration of the agreement, the bank reduces the mortgage rate without having to conclude a new agreement.

Direct discounts or a major reduction in the cost per square meter are unlikely though since developers are constrained by the highly increased construction costs in 2022-2024 and will not agree to a considerable decrease in prices. Thus, in the coming years we can expect a reduction in new residential projects launched.

Currently, the housing market in Russia, for an indefinite period, is becoming to be dominated by buyers who qualify for one of the targeted mortgage schemes and whose list will be determined by the state. The game-changer might either be a pronounced and long-lasting increase in the population’s income or a drop in the key rate and, accordingly, market rates on mortgage loans, which is unlikely at least in 2024-2025. Therefore, residential construction volumes will likely decrease. A more detailed forecast on the residential market and the entire construction industry of Russia can be found in the current EECFA Forecast Report Russia that can be purchased on our website.

[1] Families with a disabled child and families with two or more children aged 7-17 living in regions with low housing construction activity (35 regions of Russia) or in a small town (with a population of less than 50,000).

[2] The bank issues a mortgage loan to a client for purchasing a home under construction in several parts. The total loan amount is divided into several tranches (the borrower has a minimum loan payment until the new building is put into operation).

The duality of housing affordability in Romania

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug – Ebuild srl, EECFA Romania

Brașov, Romania – Photo by Zoltan Rakottyai on unsplash.com

Dr. Sebastian Sipos-Gug, EECFA’s researcher on Romania, visited the affordability of homes several times in the past as an argument for market stability and to counter doomsayers. Last time he did so, however, he wrote that the residential market was approaching a turning point. And last year, despite decelerating growth in average home prices, the hike in interest rates made housing less affordable for those resorting to a mortgage loan. In case of cash buyers, on the other hand, affordability grew to historically high levels.

Change in useful area in home permits issued in 2023 vs 2022 (own calculations based on data from NSI)

While official output data is lagging a couple of years, some indicators are painting a less optimistic picture. For instance, permits for homes dropped massively in 2023 like-for-like (-24%) and real-estate transactions also declined (-10%). Decline in the useful area in permits for residential buildings seems to be a national issue since only a handful of counties saw an increase in the useful area permitted, while the usual drivers of growth (Bucharest, Center and West regions) were in the red. This does not mean construction will necessarily decline since the permits issued in 2021 and 2022 were at historically high levels, but it does put a cap on the growth potential of the market. EECFA looked at these figures in more detail and provided forecast up to 2025 in the latest EECFA Forecast Report.

Housing affordability: a key indicator of the stability of the residential real estate market

Housing affordability can signal potential issues in the near future such as right before the market crashed in 2008 one could see that prices became disconnected from income, pointing to a speculative market. Decreasing home affordability can also have a negative impact on economic growth as it diminishes the available share of income that can be used for optional purchases.

A commonly used indicator of housing affordability is the time it would take to purchase a 70sqm home with the average monthly gross wage. While this indicator has merits in allowing international comparisons, it is preferable to look at net wages instead as fiscal changes in 2018 (moving tax burden from employers to employees) would have otherwise distorted the indicator by introducing a break in time series.

Home affordability for cash buyers: sqm in an average 2-room apartment one could afford with the average monthly net wage (own calculations based on data from NSI and imobiliare.ro)

Homes were getting more and more affordable for cash buyers as prices grew more slowly than wages in most years from 2009 onwards. However, this simple model fails to explain all of the data. If it were true that more people could afford homes, we should see a surge in purchases. If not enough homes were for sale, prices would rise quickly. Since we are not seeing either, one needs to assume that some other factor is at play here. A potential solution to this conundrum lies in the fact that cash transactions are estimated to account for slightly more than half of all transactions, with the remainder being funded by mortgage loans.

Accounting for mortgage loans, however, requires some assumptions to be made. Namely, purchasing a home with a mortgage loan that has a 25% downpayment, a 30-year loan term, an average interest rate for the respective year and no additional costs and a debt-to-income ratio of 40% of the national average net wage (currently the legal maximum with some exceptions).

This shows the impact that increasing interest rates to combat inflation has had on housing affordability. While in 2021 the average individual could purchase an average home (under the previous assumptions) of 60sqm, by 2023 this had declined to 47sqm, meaning that for borrowers homes are the least affordable in the last decade. 

Home affordability for mortgage buyers: sqm one could afford with mortgage (25% downpayment, 30-year term, 40% debt-to-income ratio of average monthly net wage) (own calculations based on data from NBR, NSI and imobiliare.ro)

What’s in store for the future?

From what we see, the major trends with impact on home affordability are somewhat optimistic:

  • Interest rates are to drop as the National Bank is set to reduce reference rates once inflation comes down. With current national and EC forecasts placing inflation within the target range by 2025-2026, a gradual reduction is expected in the reference rates by then (a positive impact on mortgage affordability).
  • Income growth rate has outperformed the increase in home prices in all but two years since 2008. With a robust labor market and a modest but positive outlook of the economy, wages are set to keep growing in real terms in the near future.
  • Rentals are an increasing alternative to purchasing a home. Traditionally, Romania has one of the highest home ownership rates in the EU (97.7% at the time of the 2011 census), but the recent uptick in rents signals a rise in demand for housing, so this warrants closer monitoring. Depending on the availability of supply, this could mean more transactions or a higher price point since a share of current renters will consider converting to a mortgage, should it be more affordable.
Rent and home price growth rates (own calculations based on data from NSI and imobiliare.ro)
  • Demography is on the decline. The overall population shrank by more than 5.3% between the two censuses of 2021 and 2011, especially in the southern part of Romania (apart from Ilfov). This should, in theory, make housing more affordable, but the demographic decline is most prevalent in less desirable rural areas, so the impact might be minimal.
Demographic changes between the 2011 and 2021 censuses (own calculations based on data from NSI)

If left unchecked, the combination of these two trends (housing is less affordable for mortgage borrowers, but housing affordability for cash buyers is record high), could lead to increased wealth inequality in longer term. For now, they seem to cancel each other out and demand is somewhat mollified. Nonetheless, Romania remains above the EU average in terms of housing affordability, and, assuming no unexpected changes in market dynamics, it is predicted to improve in the near future as inflation and interest rates come down.

A hidden threat to the Russian housing market: demography

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Andrey Vakulenko – MACON, EECFA Russia

Negative demographic trends in Russia are conditioning lower demand on the housing market in the coming decades. Due to the general population decline and aging, the number of most active home buyers will decline in the future. And this should – in the long term – lead to a reduced number of housing transactions.

Currently, the demographic situation in Russia is said to be extremely unfavourable. In July 2023, for example, only a little more than 110 thousand children were born, lower than in any July since 1945. This confirms that the country is experiencing a real ‘demographic hole’, and recovery is unlikely in the next decade.Population size and structure represent one of the main macro-drivers determining housing demand over a long period. Steady population growth leads to an increased number of individual households that over time begin to feel the need for own housing, so in virtually any housing market much demand is generated by young people purchasing their first home. The aging of the population, on the contrary, reduces demand for homes. Demographic factors are structural ones that operate long-term, over the horizon of decades, though. Now the market may show a rise in demand for housing, but if the long-term trend is negative, it will have a restraining effect and limit the potential for buyer activity. Often total population may grow or drop insignificantly, but its age structure can change significantly, determining the prospects for the residential real estate market.

Demographic trends in Russia yesterday, today and tomorrow

Russia’s population has undergone a steady downward trend in recent years. Over the past 30 years, the number of births almost every year has been way less than the number of deaths. The only exception was the period of 2012-2016 when the balance of indicators was minimally positive or near zero. In other years, there was a constant natural population decline. Record fertility rates during the USSR in the 80s have not been repeated to date: after a sharp drop in the 90s during numerous crises, the indicator recovered between 2001 and 2015, but another negative trend followed in 2015-2022 owing to the worsening macroeconomic climate and an almost constant decline in the real income of the population. And the pandemic broke the long-term trend of low population mortality, exacerbating the negative impact of decline in birth rates. Migration growth has also been insufficient in recent years and could not compensate for natural population decline, only slightly smoothing it out. Birth rates in each period determine the population size in a particular age group in the future, therefore, the current age structure of the Russian population is a consequence of past fluctuations in this indicator in different years.

In the future, the Russian population will likely decrease. As per the demographic forecast of the Federal State Statistics Service in Russia (Rosstat) and that of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, population decline is estimated at 2%–5% until 2035. In addition, the age structure of the population will continue to shift towards the elderly. The graph on population structure by age always moves to the right: the rise in fertility in the 80s led to a higher population of people aged 35-49 now, the sharp decline in fertility in the 90s caused a fall in the population aged 20-30, and the recovery in the 2000s led to an increase in the number of under 20 age group. And with the current trend of decreasing birth rates, the elderly will surpass young age groups in the next decades.

What does demography have to do with the housing market?

As population in Russia is anticipated to decline slightly (2%-5% until 2035), this is unlikely to have a major impact on overall housing demand. But the lack of growth expectations is creating negative preconditions for the market in the long run. Also, the next decade should see a demographic shift in Russia: the share of 30-year-olds will plummet against the growth of older age groups. Such shifts directly affect the residential real estate market due to the different behaviour patterns of people of different ages in the housing market. According to a 2022 study by the Bank of Russia, Russians usually live in rentals until they are 30 and first home purchase is most often done after this age. This is also indirectly confirmed by the portrait of a typical mortgage borrower (DOM.RF study), whose average age at the end of 2022 was about 37.8 years. Mortgages in Russia are ‘aging’ under the influence of ongoing demographic changes, as seen in the dynamics of the average age of the borrower and the share of young people in the total number of borrowers.

In general, the main stages of human activity in the residential real estate market are as follows:

  • 20-29 years of age: rental housing. Until 20 young people live with their parents and then separate due to studying or working. Buying a home immediately is accessible to very few, so they rent flats.
  • 30-39 years of age: purchasing a first home. At this age, families are established, children are born. The first home is usually purchased to ensure comfortable living conditions.
  • 40-49 years of age: improving living conditions. After 40 people reach the peak of their career and financial well-being, enabling them to improve living conditions. This can either be an increase in space or change in the home (moving from a flat to a house).
  • 50-64 years of age: optimization of housing. Children grow up and live separately, pushing this age group to optimize housing (moving to a smaller home or to another city/region).
  • 65 years and older: transfer of housing by inheritance.

Considering the predicted age structure of the population, in the coming years Russia will see the largest and most active demand group (first home buyers/those aged 30-39) steadily decline. Population structure will be redistributed towards the age groups of 40 years and older who are considerably less active in the market. This will certainly be negative for housing demand. At the same time, negative trends will to some extent be smoothed out by the following demographic factors:

  • Expected increase – after a long decline – in the number of young people aged 20-29 in 2026-2035. They mainly focus on rentals, but demand for rentals will push them to be more active in home purchases mainly in large cities that are educational and economic centres.
  • The 2020-2021 census showed that the number of households consisting of one person is steadily increasing: their share is now about 42%, almost twice as high as in 2022 (22%). More single people will need more housing units, supporting housing demand.
  • Great need for new and high-quality housing. Residential volume per capita in Russia is about 28 sqm/1 person, way lower than in developed countries, and lower than the target values of state housing programs (min. 30 sqm/person). Low income, coupled with an often outdated and low-quality housing stock, creates need for more frequent improvement in housing conditions.

Having these in mind, the ‘aging’ housing market is not a disaster, it is rather a structural factor that we will need to adapt to. Nonetheless, the gradual contraction of the traditionally most active demand base and the overall downward trend in population will put pressure on the market. An additional challenge for housing developers will be to adapt the product to the needs of older buyers whose number will grow in the near future.

Residential forecast for Russia is available in the latest EECFA Forecast Report Russia. For orders and sample report, please visit eecfa.com. EECFA (Eastern European Construction Forecasting Association) conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries, including Russia.

Rebuilding post-earthquake Türkiye

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Prof. Ali Türel, EECFA Türkiye

Türkiye’s high inflation so far has continued to rise in the course of this year, given May’s election-fuelled wage increases and the state transfers to rebuild facilities in the aftermath of the February quakes. The new administration is exercising a conventional economic policy, but post-disaster reconstruction is estimated to cost EUR 100 billion and will require huge money allocations from the state this year and next.

Macroeconomic developments

Türkiye has seen a change in economic policy after the re-election of President Erdoğan on 28 May 2023. Mehmet Şimşek, the new Minister of Treasury and Finance, and Dr. Hafize Gaye Erkan, the new Governor of the Central Bank of Türkiye (CBT) adopted a return to conventional economic policies. The CBT stopped reducing the base rate, and in 3 successive months, it raised it from 8.5 base point level to 25. Bank interest rates for deposit accounts and credits grew, though they still have high real negative rates.

The Government’s lucrative policies in minimum wage and early retirement continued after the election with high pay rises for public sector employees. The enormously destructive earthquakes on 6 February 2023 in 11 provinces also raised the government’s financing obligations. These increases in money supply, coupled with the big rises in the exchange rate of foreign currencies against the Turkish Lira in 3 months after the election (36% in Euro) have led to an upward trend in the inflation rate. The yearly rise in the Consumer Price Index was 47.83%, monthly 9.49%, and in the Domestic Producer Price Index was 44.50% and 8.23%, respectively, at end July. The CBT revised its inflation forecast to about 59.5% by the end of 2023.

Building developments

The construction sector is responding to these macroeconomic developments differently in starts and completions. In Q2 2023, building construction permits rose by 43.83% quarterly and 25.6% yearly in total floor area, while completions declined by 16.6% quarterly and 28.6% yearly. House building had a similar trend in Q2 2023; construction permit-issued housing grew by 44.3% quarterly to 188,7 thousand and 43.8% yearly to 741,7 thousand dwelling units, whereas occupancy permits fell by 15.3% quarterly to 106,9 thousand and 16.6% yearly for 570,3 thousand dwelling units.  The social housing project to produce about 253 thousand dwelling units by the Housing Development Administration (HDA) announced in Q4 2022 did not lead to that much increase in the start statistics.    

Low-cost social housing (produced by the HDA and sold to households not owning a house with affordable mortgage loans) and a commercial housing project by a private developer under construction in Ankara. Photo by Prof. Ali Türel, EECFA Türkiye

Among building types other than housing, construction permits for hotels, offices and industrial buildings had a quarterly and yearly positive rate of change. Occupancy permits were negative, only hotel buildings’ quarterly change and industrial buildings’ yearly change saw positive trends.

Due to high real estate prices under the effect of negative real interest rates, there seems to be a tendency to start building development, but builders may be unsure about the marketing prospects and profitability of their projects as real incomes have been dropping owing to continued inflation since 2018.

Forecast for the Turkish construction market is available in the EECFA Forecast Report. EECFA conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries. Orders and sample report: eecfa.com.

Housing prices, construction cost, housing transactions

This June Housing Price Index for new buildings went up by 95.8% yearly as the national average (it was 90% in Istanbul, 102.3% in Ankara and 99% in İzmir). Since residential construction costs rose by 51.8% in June 2023 like-for-like, it implies a 44-percentage point difference between housing price and construction cost. Such a great spread between housing prices and construction costs should indicate a housing deficit, augmented by the 4,9 million registered refugees mainly from Syria and many unregistered migrants from other countries. The fewer completions than starts (when the profit margin is high) can be explained by the affordability problem under inflationary conditions.

Housing transactions between January and July 2023 were 17.7% less than in the same 7 months of 2022. Mortgaged sales were 20.2% in January-July 2023, dropping by 28.2% like-for-like. Affordability for mortgage loan repayments significantly decreased when mortgage interest rates rose to 35%/year. State-owned banks provide mortgage loans at between 0.69-0.99% monthly rates to people who are not homeowners, but the total number of these loans did not greatly affect the share of mortgaged transactions.

Rebuilding earthquake-damaged buildings and infrastructure

The quakes this February in the southeast regions must be dealt with under the Law on Natural Disasters, which defines precautionary measures, government obligations for post-disaster recovery, mitigation activities and rebuilding damaged buildings. With the organizations established for this purpose, the Government has been undertaking activities in the earthquake-hit 11 provinces since the quakes occurred. The Law requires the reconstruction of collapsed and heavily damaged buildings, both housing and workplaces, with financial commitments by the Government. The money spent becomes an interest-free loan, and owners of rebuilt properties begin to repay 2 years after they move in and in 20 years. Because of prolonged high inflation, interest-free loans serve as an important real gain for those people.

As per Mehmet Özhaseki, the Minister of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change (the organization responsible for rebuilding collapsed and pulled down heavily damaged buildings), as of 7 July 2023 in 11 provinces 311 thousand buildings with 872 thousand independent units collapsed or were pulled down. The total number of urban and rural housing to be rebuilt is 680 thousand. They planned to rebuild 518 thousand dwelling units in urban settlements and 162 thousand housing in rural areas with stables. About 180 thousand dwelling units and 6 thousand workplaces are currently under construction. They expect to complete the construction of 319 thousand dwelling units within one year. They also offer financial assistance rather than building a home, comprised of a 500.000 TL (17.241 Euro at 19 TL/Euro exchange rate) grant and 500.000 TL interest-free credit to the eligible people for state support, to be repaid in 10 years. Similar offers are also made to all workplaces.

Tentative estimates for the reconstruction are EUR 100 billion. With the existing 253 thousand social housing under construction, there will be big financial requirements from the national budget for public projects this year and next. Demand for construction materials and qualified labour will be high if we add the construction of all types of commercial buildings to state housing projects.

Slovenian housing construction boom continues – but for how long?

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Dr Aleš Pustovrh – Bogatin, EECFA Slovenia

Residential construction boom in Slovenia continues and is set to peak this year. Nevertheless, with increasing interest rates on mortgage loans, residential construction will be facing significantly lower demand in the second half of 2023.

Slovenia continued to see strong economic growth in 2022, up by 5.4%, beating the expectations at the start of the year. But this growth greatly slowed down in late 2022 and early 2023 as increasing interest rates and high inflation started to impact disposable income. This has not resulted in slower construction growth; both civil engineering and non-residential construction greatly expanded in 2022 in nominal terms. The level of construction activity in these two subsectors was still quite close to the 2015 average (even slightly below that average in non-residential construction). But most of the nominal growth was the result of higher inflation and thus, higher construction costs. 

In residential construction, the situation is completely different. The level of residential construction was 3.3 times higher in 2021 than in 2015 in real terms (and 4 times higher in nominal terms). And in 2022 it was a staggering 5.35 times higher in real terms than in 2015 (7.8 times higher in nominal terms). At the beginning of 2023 it continued to grow by 46% annually, which is unsustainable.

Vurnikova hisa, Miklosiceva cesta, Ljubljana by Pavol Svantner unsplash.com

While demand for dwellings has likely exceeded demand in the post-COVID boom of 2021 and 2022, supply has been catching up lately and more and more dwellings have been completed. The total value of sold real estate in 2015 was estimated at EUR 1.8 billion, while in 2021 at EUR 2.8 billion[1]. Approximately 10000 dwellings are sold in Slovenia on average every year, with around 3000 in Ljubljana. At least that many are estimated to be currently under construction in Ljubljana alone. These will enter the market in 2023 and 2024, but potential customers for these dwellings are facing elevated interest rates on mortgage loans. As per recent calculations, monthly loan repayment for a EUR 200,000 loan in Slovenia has increased by EUR 400-500, making potential customers think twice before even applying for a loan. This is already evident in the real estate prices in Ljubljana that peaked in Q1 2022 and have not increased since[2], even though the overall inflation rate was almost 10% in 2022.

Forecast for the Slovenian construction market is available in the EECFA Forecast Report. EECFA conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries. Orders and sample report: eecfa.com.

That means that skyrocketing housing construction in Slovenia, especially in its capital city, will be facing significantly lower demand than it was expected when construction started in 2021 and 2022. And even though residential construction growth rate is still very high, by most estimations, demand will considerably decline in the second half of 2023. If residential construction stays at the same level as in 2022, a lot will depend on public schemes for non-profit dwellings starting to contribute to total residential construction output. Private housing construction will most likely complete the projects that were started but will be reluctant to start new ones. In Q1 2023, 12% fewer building permits were issued for dwellings than a year ago[3].

Residential construction is set to reach its peak output in the first half of 2023. This will impact overall construction too, because this segment is more important than non-residential or civil engineering. It seems that residential construction boom in Slovenia will reach its peak in 2023, but the real question is how fast it will decrease in the future.

[1] https://www.e-prostor.gov.si/fileadmin/Podrocja/Trg_vrednosti_nep/Trg_nepremicnin/Porocila_o_trgu_nepremicnin/2021/Letno_porocilo_za_leto_2021.pdf

[2] https://siol.net/posel-danes/novice/kolaps-trga-v-tem-delu-ljubljane-stanovanja-po-2-600-evrov-na-kvadrat-595442

[3] https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/News/Index/11005

April briefing on Serbia

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Dejan Krajinović, Beobuild Core d.o.o., EECFA Serbia

High inflation and rising interest rates seem to have bitten in overall consumption. And although Serbia is likely to avoid recession in the short run, its real GDP growth is estimated to be a moderate 2%-4% this year and next with a downside risk being the looming recession in the EU. The rental housing market has been supported by the Russian and Ukrainian citizens settling down in Serbia, keeping rent rates high. Housing construction is still strong and although the volumes in building construction are already consolidating, big infrastructure projects could sustain civil engineering on all-high levels in mid-term.

Property market developments

Macroeconomic conditions in Serbia have been under significant stress for a while now, and continuously strong inflation has already produced a major drop in overall consumption. The real estate market was expected to start cooling down in 2022, but instead, there was another record year in both volume and the number of transactions. Unlike real estate markets in a number of European countries, where under the influence of interest rates there was a considerable slowdown and drop in prices, the level of real estate prices in Serbia recorded a strong growth during 2022. With lot of uncertainty on the horizon, home permits have already started pulling back in 2023, but this is still not visible in property prices. Demand stayed stronger than supply, and monetary policies of the ECB and the National Bank of Serbia have had little effect on the market so far. 

Photo – Beobuild Core d.o.o.

During the last twelve months the National Bank of Serbia significantly tightened its monetary policy by increasing reference interest rates from 1.5% to 6%, as of April 2023. Since inflation in Serbia is in large part imported through energy and food costs, rising interest rates could start suffocating the economy, so the National Bank will have to consider diversifying its means of fighting the inflation. At the same time, Euro-indexed home loans also reached similar interest rate levels of around 6% in Q1 2023. While the total number of transactions grew in 2022, the share of mortgages decreased from 13% in 2021 to just 11% of all property transactions in 2022. Home market has a bit higher exposure to loans, making some 20% of all transactions supported by mortgages, but interest rate hikes barely affected overall numbers. During the Q1 2023 similar trends continued, where prices continued to grow and the scale of transactions only fell slightly in number, but not in value.

Beside strong tourism figures, there has been some 200.000 residence and working permits issued for citizens of Russia and Ukraine since the conflict started – an unexpected support for the home market and accommodation. In March 2023, 10.000 residence permits and 5.000 working permits were issued: a monthly record so far. The newly arrived have certainly been felt in the renting part of the market as monthly rents hit the roof during H2 2022. The situation stabilized during Q1 2023, but the small renting capacity will keep prices high for the time being. Those who decide to stay and build a life in Serbia will eventually enter the buyer market, and the majority is highly educated and employed.

Expectations in economy and construction

Although employment still stands strong in Serbia, as in many other European countries, it will inevitably feel the economic shift and face challenges in due course. Particularly if current international conditions and trading relations stay severe or even worsen in the coming period. So far, it seems that Serbia will most probably avoid recession in short term, but real GDP growth will relatively be weak, ranging between 2%-4% in 2023 and 2024. Employment continued to grow in 2022 and Q1 2023, so the situation is still stable, but new challenges could emerge in H2 2023 and later in 2024. The worsening economic situation and looming recession in the EU is the main risk for the Serbian economy, as the EU is an important source of investments and a prime export destination.   

In order to mitigate the expected lower investment activity of the private sector, the Serbian government will certainly push for the realization of public investments. The ongoing campaign of large-scale infrastructure projects should continue in most civil engineering segments, including roads, railroads and utilities, so this should sustain civil construction on record levels in mid-term. The construction of buildings and its volume will be challenged far more, but the good news is that FDI inflow to real estate continues to be very strong in segments like industrial and storage, office or residential. The volumes in building construction are already consolidating, but the picture is still mixed in different segments. The residential market is still not showing weakness and construction activity here remains strong. Also, the Serbian market has very low vacancies in commercial and office segments as a healthy parameter and strong foundation in the current economic environment.

At the moment there are still significant risks related to the scenarios of a prolonged and escalating economic crisis, but there is still hope the worst can be avoided.

Forecast for the Serbian construction market is available in the EECFA Forecast Report. EECFA conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries. For orders and sample report, go to eecfa.com.

Croatian construction output makeup changes: more hospitals, fewer flats?

Posted on by efalucskai

Written by Michael Glazer (SEE Regional Advisors) and Tatjana Halapija (Nada Projekt), EECFA’s Croatia members

The composition of Croatia’s construction output is changing. While the residential segment may soon experience a slowdown, health-related construction – public and private renovations and new builds alike – is seeing a considerable boom.

Photo by Hajnalka Hurta

Construction continues strong in Croatia. The country’s State Bureau of Statistics announced earlier this month that construction permits issued in January 2023 were up 19.1% in number and 40.5% in value compared to January 2022. While permitting in Croatia can vary significantly from month to month, these data certainly suggest that the sector remains vibrant. So do the Bureau’s statistics for 2022 construction volume versus that for 2021. According to the Bureau, the value of completed construction work carried out by business entities in Croatia with 20 or more employees increased by 12.9% in 2022 compared to 2021, while the value of new orders increased by 27.1%.

But while construction as a whole remains robust, a number of sectors are weakening as changes in the composition of construction volume continue. Where once the tide of construction activity raised all sector’s boats, airport and highway construction has now given way to rail on the civil engineering side. On the buildings side, construction of residences may at last be cooling down from its white-hot heat of the last few years. The Statistics Bureau’s recent announcement of a 9.8% decline between January 2022 and January 2023 in the number of apartments for which permit applications were submitted suggests this.

Current forecast for Croatia is available in the EECFA Construction Forecast Report. EECFA (Eastern European Construction Forecasting Association) conducts research on the construction markets of 8 Eastern-European countries. For orders and sample report: eecfa.com

So, paradoxically, does the 20.2% rise in the average price of new apartments between 2021 and 2022. Inflation clearly accounts for a substantial part of this increase. And supply may have shifted to higher priced units. But it nonetheless appears that a significant increase in real prices for equivalent apartments has likely occurred. In this regard, the Governor of the Croatian National Bank recently pointed out that the volume of residential property sales is decreasing, something that he notes usually precedes a fall in prices. Tighter mortgage conditions and higher interest rates also likely played a role.

On the other hand, a type of construction is that is booming but not getting the attention that it deserves is construction of healthcare facilities. Both public and private facilities have been and are being built in unprecedented numbers. The subsector’s strength has come from both public and private projects and from both renovations and new builds. This despite a push, so far not highly successful, on the part of the Croatian government to, in the name of efficiency, consolidate a number of healthcare facilities that now exist in low population localities.

On the public side, significant construction has been ongoing for some time now. Among the larger projects have been the consolidation and expansion of the Rijeka Clinical Hospital Center, a multi-year, more-than-hundred-fifty-million euro project that is now in its third phase. This project includes the Hospital for Mother and Child, a new facility to consolidate gynecology, obstetrics and pediatric facilities previously housed in outdated facilities in two different towns. In Zagreb, projects completed or already underway include the total reconstruction of the city’s Clinic for Infectious Diseases and the renovation of the Zagreb Clinical Hospital Center’s Jordanovac, Rebro and Petrova facilities, the Sisters of Mercy Clinical Hospital Center, the Merkur Clinical Hospital and the Children’s Hospital. Elsewhere, a new, 100-million-euro General Hospital was built in Pula, and various smaller, regional facilities were upgraded, including in Bjelovar and Varazdin.

While a good deal of Croatia’s public medical facility construction has been completed, much still remains to be undertaken. In addition to further upgrades to current facilities nationwide and the possible construction of a National Children’s Hospital in Zagreb, considerable work remains to be done to repair the damage caused by the two earthquakes that struck Croatia in 2020, including significant reconstruction at Zagreb’s Faculty of Medicine. The government is also pushing health tourism, with a minimum of EUR 61 million to be invested in public and private projects in this field.

Private healthcare construction projects are also proliferating. Among those recently built are Akromion’s 10,000 m2 hospital for orthopedics and trauma and Sveta Katarina’s 4,000 m2 facility, both in Zagreb. A variety of other facilities are in the planning stages, although their exact characteristics, e.g., as to size and in some cases even nature, remain either confidential or as yet undecided. The government’s increased focus on and funding of healthcare tourism is likely to significantly increase activity in the healthcare subsector.

As the Croatian economy evolves, particularly as it responds to Croatia’s entry into the Schengen Area and the Eurozone, more changes in the composition of construction volume must be expected. As an example, it is claimed that already one in three Croatian residences is bought by a foreigner. And the country seems to at last be being discovered as a manufacturing location, with Jabil, a major US-based manufacturer, building a large facility in Osijek. The consequences of these changes for total volume are hard to predict, but are certain to occur.