Written by Dr Aleš Pustovrh – Bogatin, EECFA Slovenia
Slovenia’s housing market is in a curious state. Prices for both new and existing homes keep rising, yet the country still lacks a reliable measure of how far supply trails demand. Official data show steady appreciation across all major cities—Ljubljana most of all—while construction remains hampered by slow permitting, high input costs and a fragmented building industry. Politicians promise a surge in public and affordable housing but estimates of the true shortfall—whether based on household formation, demographics or unmet rental demand—are patchy and inconsistent. The average price per square metre has jumped by roughly 50% since 2021, but the structural imbalance behind this surge is harder to pin down, leaving policymakers to grapple with a problem they can only describe vaguely.

With a general election looming in March 2026, the absence of clear data creates fertile ground for confusion and political spin. The ruling coalition boasts of raising annual public‑housing investment to €100mn, pledging €1bn over the next decade. The public housing fund plans around 2,000 new units in the coming years, with perhaps 1,000 more from other public bodies. Private developers, especially in Ljubljana, are building briskly, too. Given that Slovenia completes about 5,000 homes a year, these additions ought to shift the market—at least in theory.
But the scale of need remains uncertain. In 2021 Slovenia counted 864,300 dwellings for 859,782 households—roughly one per household. Prices, though rising fast, remain below those in some neighbouring countries. The median price of used homes was €3,070 per square metre (nearly €5,000 in Ljubljana), while the average gross monthly wage was €2,500—yielding a price‑to‑income ratio lower than in many EU states. Mortgage credit is widely available and relatively cheap, with interest rates well below 4%. Outstanding housing loans rose from €8.5bn to more than €9bn in 2025, suggesting that many households are managing their residential construction investments without state support.
One of the outgoing government’s flagship measures—a clampdown on short‑term rentals—was meant to push more homes into the long‑term market. It may instead swell the ranks of empty properties: around 19% of dwellings already stand vacant. A straightforward remedy, a property tax to nudge owners to rent out unused homes, was avoided for fear of angering voters in a country where 75% of households own their homes.
The lack of solid data allows politicians to champion measures unlikely to achieve their stated aims, while sidestepping those that might work but would prove unpopular. Election season is rarely conducive to sober policymaking, but the next government will need better data—and the courage to act on it—if it hopes to make any meaningful dent in Slovenia’s housing woes.
More on Slovenia’s housing market and housing forecast up to 2027 can be found in the EECFA Slovenia Construction Forecast Report. Sample report and orders: https://eecfa.com/







